Asrock H110M-HG4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HG4  (all builds)
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180622
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '21 at 17:06
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 180
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 320
40% 307 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.48% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 0.6
2% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 2
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.48%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 240GB SSD 240GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 24 23 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 416
Write 80
Mixed 71
SusWrite 22.8
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.1
31% 8.13 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
152GB free
Firmware: 3E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 93 90 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 78.8
Write 83
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 93
54% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 58%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 2GB
2GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 5.7 5.6 5.5 5.7 5.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Read 22
Write 5.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 5.4
9% 8.58 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.9
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-HG4 Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback