Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro13,3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro13,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-A5C67F76ED83108C
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 00:01
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 76
1-Core 106
2-Core 186
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 463
51% 402 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 455
Apple(106B 0166) 2GB
CLim: 855 MHz, MLim: 1270 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 21.1
Parallax 23.4
14% 20.6 fps
MRender 19.9
Gravity 16.7
Splatting 18.4
15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0512L 500GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXS6AA0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 983 992 1006 923 918 926 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,005
Write 931
Mixed 706
SusWrite 958
203% 900 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 12
48% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 990
DQ Write 484
DQ Mixed 620
491% 698 MB/s
Poor: 146%
This bench: 146%
Great: 241%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B3445424533303445422D45474347202020 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
72.1% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 22.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 21.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro13,3 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacBookPro13,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback