Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H77-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '21 at 09:12
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$80
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 63.3
1-Core 97
2-Core 197
66% 119 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 303
43% 315 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 84CA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.6
3% 3.23 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE5000RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 263
Write 156
Mixed 190
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 14.2
42% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 19.6
DQ Write 26
DQ Mixed 18.7
15% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 55%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
223GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 326
Write 223
Mixed 265
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 10.1
67% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 98.1
DQ Mixed 15.4
25% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-023.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 5.3
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M PRO Builds (Compare 730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $799
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback