MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 08 '21 at 10:14
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 81.4
1-Core 166
2-Core 326
102% 191 Pts
4-Core 641
8-Core 1208
110% 924 Pts
64-Core 2229
138% 2229 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 4051) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 165
Parallax 156
149% 168 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 133
Splatting 115
112% 140 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 240GB-$110
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC01.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 169 207 145 127 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 493
Write 310
Mixed 268
SusWrite 171
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 33.7
123% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 37.7
DQ Mixed 59
62% 107 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74%
Great: 91%
Crucial MTFDDAK480TDN 480GB
247GB free
Firmware: D1DF003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 420 420 418 420 419 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 273
Write 418
Mixed 305
SusWrite 420
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 33.4
112% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 104%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$70
118GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 273 273 273 272 272 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 300
Mixed 333
SusWrite 293
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 53.7
182% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 157
130% 187 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 103%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
740GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 105 103 103 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 100
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 104
70% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4B.M8FB1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 32.3
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 32.7
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,052
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback