Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	67.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200220
Uptime	8.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '21 at 02:19
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	Memory 89.6 1-Core 143 2-Core 284 94% 172 Pts	4-Core 557 8-Core 788 84% 672 Pts	64-Core 709 44% 709 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% EVGA(3842 1161) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.4% Good	Lighting 89.3 Reflection 85.6 Parallax 74.7 73% 83.2 fps	MRender 63.2 Gravity 76.3 Splatting 69 57% 69.5 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB 30,264 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0824A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 35 4.4 9.7 77 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 424 Write 174 Mixed 42.4 SusWrite 35.4 36% 169 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 0.6 51% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 55.2 DQ Mixed 1.1 27% 67.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 102%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$49 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 31GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 289 454 462 454 325 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 474 Write 446 Mixed 426 SusWrite 406 99% 438 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 89.8 4K Mixed 50.5 163% 57.9 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 290 237% 338 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Silicon-Power SP008GXLZU320BSB 2x8GB 270 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 22.2 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 26.1 SC Mixed 22.6 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H370M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	220x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	142x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	113x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	69x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	55x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	41x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $323

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16