Asus PRIME H270-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 15 '21 at 16:05
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 225
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 671
65% 534 Pts
64-Core 668
41% 668 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$226
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 120
Parallax 125
110% 127 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 103
Splatting 88.6
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 184 210 209 200 195 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 438
Write 309
Mixed 224
SusWrite 199
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 31.2
135% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 110
132% 234 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 400GB (2007)-$42
80GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
29% Poor
Read 43.5
Write 27
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 57.1
30% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29%
Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
494GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 63 89 89 87 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 110
Write 109
Mixed 62
SusWrite 81.5
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 68%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 320GB
1GB free
Firmware: 0103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.9
Write 27.2
Mixed 32.3
25% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 50%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 33.1
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 11.2
20% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 72%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 1TB
4GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 40.5
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 12.2
23% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 70%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 3TB
245GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 40
Write 41.5
Mixed 36.4
SusWrite 11.2
24% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15%
Great: 102%
USB3.0 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 187 189 189 189 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 134
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 187
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Mushkin MB[A/B]4U240FFFF16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
72.7% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 23.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 23.4
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H270-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PLUS - $3,094

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $3,464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback