IBM 00MU899

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIBM 00MU899  (all builds)
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150216
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 26 '21 at 11:32
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
Socket 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 194
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 744
64% 547 Pts
64-Core 2,921
181% 2,921 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5210 899GB
786GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 203 197 201 192 205 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
122% Outstanding
Read 226
Write 176
Mixed 118
SusWrite 200
132% 180 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1.6
300% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 122%
Great: 122%
IBM ServeRAID M5210 3.5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 69 69 66 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
165% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 47
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 68
124% 171 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.2
639% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 165%
Great: 222%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
451GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 11 13 13 15 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 14
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 11.7
17% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0
24% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 4D33393341324734304442302D4350422020 4x16GB
4 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.2% Good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 23.8
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback