Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 8% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8300 3,228 User benchmarks, average bench 24% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Memory 37.2 1-Core 3 2-Core 6.5 14% 15.6 Pts	4-Core 9.8 8-Core 14.8 2% 12.3 Pts	64-Core 35.8 2% 35.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.09% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 1.69 Parallax 1.66 1% 1.51 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 2 1% 1.62 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.09% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Generic NCard 62GB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.1 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 130 Write 62.6 Mixed 80.5 68% 91.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.85 4K Write 3.09 4K Mixed 1.76 455% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 67%
Generic SS16G SD Card 16GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 15GB free Firmware: 8.0 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 44.9 Write 7.49 Mixed 13.3 16% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.42 4K Write 2.47 4K Mixed 1.04 387% 2.98 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	9.98% Terrible	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.53 GB/s	SC Read 1 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 0.9 4% 1.33 GB/s	Latency 216 19% 216 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.98% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM