Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 755

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 755
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 755  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080311
Uptime20.6 Days
Run DateMar 31 '21 at 18:12
Run Duration1619 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual E2180-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
30.4% Below average
Memory 55.3
1-Core 17.7
2-Core 34.9
26% 36 Pts
4-Core 35
8-Core 35
5% 35 Pts
64-Core 35.5
2% 35.5 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 41%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 185 175 137 115 136 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37% Below average
Read 212
Write 205
Mixed 195
SusWrite 151
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 17
48% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 89.4
DQ Write 85.9
DQ Mixed 77.5
61% 84.3 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 37%
Great: 128%
Maxtor 6V200E0 204GB
49GB free
Firmware: VA111900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 45 42 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 46.5
Write 46.2
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 43.5
31% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.4
134% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 37%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
115GB free, PID a009
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 15 14 13 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
7.87% Terrible
Read 25
Write 21.5
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 14.8
24% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.87%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
103GB free, PID a208
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 15 15 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 24
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 14.8
28% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 44%
USB Flash Memory 2GB
1GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8.2
Write 3.2
Mixed 4.2
6% 5.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 755 Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 755

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback