Asus P4C800-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P4C800-E  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 16:31
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.55 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 77
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 44.8
40% 54.5 Pts
4-Core 44.2
8-Core 45.4
6% 44.8 Pts
64-Core 45.5
3% 45.5 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce FX 5200
Device(0000 0000) 128MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 9.6.8.5
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0
Reflection 0.1
0% 0.05 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6L300R0 300GB-$46
36GB free
Firmware: BAH41G10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 35 36 37 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 35.8
Write 43.8
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 36.1
26% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
146% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 34%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
7GB free
Firmware: 1AA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 90 86 82 75 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 52.8
Write 70.8
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 82.2
46% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 62%
Promise 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 149GB
10GB free
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 25 24 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.2% Below average
Read 101
Write 97.8
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 24.2
51% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.6
278% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 36%
SiImage 500GB
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 30 30 29 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.3
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 0.1
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P4C800-E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus P4C800-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback