Asus P5KPL-CM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-CM  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100827
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 23 '14 at 17:08
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6550-$12
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 48.3
18% 38 Pts
4-Core 54.7
8-Core 54.8
7% 54.8 Pts
64-Core 53.7
3% 53.7 Pts
Poor: 26% Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
72GB free
Firmware: JPFOA39C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 73.6
Write 65.9
Mixed 37.9
44% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.4
94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 50%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
18GB free
Firmware: 10.01E04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 42.2
Write 37.3
Mixed 35.8
29% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.37
87% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 33%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01E04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 48.2
Write 45.8
Mixed 42.8
34% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.21
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.15
47% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27%
Great: 33%
WDC WD80 0JD-75MSA3 80GB
74GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.2% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 26
Mixed 18.5
30% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.45
76% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 15%
WDC WD80 0JD-75MSA3 80GB
63GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.9% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 26.1
Mixed 26.8
34% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.44
73% 0.8 MB/s
Typical P5KPL-CM Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-CM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback