Gigabyte GA-H310M S2P 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2P 2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190517
Uptime11.9 Days
Run DateApr 04 '21 at 00:25
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 224
85% 144 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 439
61% 444 Pts
64-Core 424
28% 424 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B E263) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
5.45% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 8.9
5% 8 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 6.2
6% 6.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.45%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$21
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 80 67 86 85 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 110
Write 103
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 74.2
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 53%
Great: 82%
Excelstor Technology J8160S 165GB
5GB free
Firmware: P22OA50U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 38 40 38 38 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 38
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 37.5
26% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 39%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
68GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 65 64 54 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 148
Write 70.5
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 61
66% 89 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
26GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 84 83 89 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 38.7
Write 107
Mixed 104
SusWrite 90.2
64% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.5
155% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 68%
Seagate M3 Portable 500GB
23GB free
Firmware: 1306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 95 97 96 91 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 90
Write 62.8
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 93.8
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 64%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
205GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 80 77 73 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 82.5
Write 77.7
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 76.4
52% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 47%
Seagate M3 Portable 500GB
0GB free
Firmware: 0707
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 34.7
Write 40
Mixed 30.3
26% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 64%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$40
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.9% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 11.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 61.1
65% 61.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-H310M S2P 2.0 Builds (Compare 860 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2P 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $450
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback