MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive368% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210301
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 04 '21 at 21:52
Run Duration1818 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$170
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 147
2-Core 294
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,083
100% 835 Pts
64-Core 1,485
92% 1,485 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106
561GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2098 2073 2044 2034 2022 2038 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
368% Outstanding
Read 2,605
Write 2,115
Mixed 1,362
SusWrite 2,051
456% 2,033 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 76
280% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,269
DQ Write 1,090
DQ Mixed 1,120
856% 1,160 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 368%
Great: 477%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
486GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2400 2160 1148 1156 1157 1157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 2,518
Write 2,328
Mixed 1,619
SusWrite 1,530
448% 1,999 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 95.3
326% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,343
DQ Write 1,213
DQ Mixed 1,267
953% 1,275 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 352%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
238GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 226 226 226 226 228 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 449
Mixed 449
SusWrite 226
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 98.5
4K Mixed 57.1
188% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 102%
Great: 133%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 644GB
154GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 226 225 225 225 225 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 418
Mixed 429
SusWrite 226
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 48
156% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 91%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
10GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9.6 11 9.1 11 9.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 77.1
Write 14.2
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 9.8
28% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
45% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 39.8
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.9
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 41.6
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,046
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback