Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory7.88GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.88GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2.1 GB free of 7.87891 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '21 at 06:43
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.8% Very good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 206
71% 127 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 393
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 161GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 38 36 37 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 116
Write 99.6
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 37.3
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 103%
Vmware Virtual disk 161GB
117GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 38 36 37 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 5.2
Write 12.7
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 37.3
11% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
79% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 103%
Vmware Virtual disk 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 157 156 156 158 157 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.7% Excellent
Read 150
Write 145
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 156
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 1024, 512, 256, 128, 4 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 0.2
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback