PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H77-V LE (all builds) |
Memory | 1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20121012 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Apr 14 '21 at 18:07 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.2%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 173 100 50 49 43 MB/s
|
51.1%
Above average
|
|||
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
70GB free
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 58 58 58 57 MB/s
|
34%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
74GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 60 60 61 60 MB/s
|
28.9%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
45%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 400x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 128x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 100x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 75x |
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 74x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 55x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $494 |