Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire V3-571G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-571G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA50_HC_CR
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121225
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 17 '21 at 05:54
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 82
2-Core 154
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 387
41% 326 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0647) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 2.9
3% 4.23 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 359
Write 402
Mixed 346
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 25.7
92% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 167
157% 240 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Adata ED600 1TB
587GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 27 26 25 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 23.1
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 26.3
19% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 72%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$34
341GB free
Firmware: 4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 106 106 106 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 29.2
Write 41.7
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 105
34% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-571G Builds (Compare 1,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-571G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback