Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150915
Uptime7 Days
Run DateApr 21 '21 at 16:21
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 516
56% 446 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 3397) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 53 98 31 42 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 317
Write 125
Mixed 189
SusWrite 52.8
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 21.3
75% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 88.7
DQ Mixed 37.9
46% 81.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030EB68F9W1600 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.8% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback