Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '21 at 04:21
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 237
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 706
71% 576 Pts
64-Core 890
55% 890 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 19
15% 18.7 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 17.2
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
836GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 39 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 4,718
Write 43.5
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 38.4
254% 1,222 MB/s
4K Read 324
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 5.6
499% 111 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 323%
Great: 305%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
298GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 88 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 75.7
Write 83.1
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 86.6
54% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 59%
Toshiba MD04ACA50D 5TB
581GB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 103 95 94 93 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 179
Write 135
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 95.1
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
436% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 108%
Toshiba MD04ACA600 6TB-$250
872GB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 116 116 113 119 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 174
Write 156
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 115
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
313% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 112%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
160GB free
Firmware: JU00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 62 73 74 74 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 132
Write 126
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 72.6
70% 96 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 79%
WD WD120EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 204 204 206 201 206 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 213
Mixed 153
SusWrite 202
141% 192 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 2.6
685% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 116%
Great: 115%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.6 1 1.5 1 1.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 157
Write 126
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 1
110% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 57%
OOS3000G 3TB
1TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 67 84 83 83 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 122
Write 103
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 67.5
117% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 38%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB
60GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 39.4
Write 31.4
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 0.7
37% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 46%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
930GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 90 90 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 90.1
Write 88.3
Mixed 54
SusWrite 88.4
108% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 32.2
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 28.4
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback