Today's hottest deals

Intel X79M-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79M-S  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '21 at 15:05
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 55.4
2-Core 111
51% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 422
41% 338 Pts
64-Core 619
38% 619 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.2% Below average
Lighting 42
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 39
34% 40.5 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 27.4
28% 35.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 60GB 60GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0809B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 194 172 40 36 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 445
Write 191
Mixed 246
SusWrite 108
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 7.8
62% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 98.8
DQ Write 88.2
DQ Mixed 15.7
33% 67.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 72%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$32
233GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 72 70 72 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 70.7
Write 70.5
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 70.7
46% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 18.8
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 9
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79M-S Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X79M-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback