bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 2560 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 2560 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 2560 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '21 at 18:58
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6148
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 196
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 753
67% 569 Pts
64-Core 749
46% 749 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID T4-2B
Nvidia(10DE 130A) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.77
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Lighting 80
Reflection 98.8
Parallax 89.8
65% 89.5 fps
MRender 45
Gravity 45
Splatting 45
37% 45 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 86GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 451
Write 279
Mixed 386
82% 372 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 9.6
35% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 41.2
DQ Write 37.5
DQ Mixed 38.4
29% 39 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 49.5
MC Mixed 40.3
123% 43.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 6
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 103%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback