HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81FA
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '17 at 13:40
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 59.5
2-Core 96.9
45% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 152
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 81FA) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Lighting 6.17
Reflection 9.65
Parallax 8.59
5% 8.14 fps
MRender 7.52
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 8.91
6% 7.65 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z331 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 475
Write 234
Mixed 259
71% 323 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 3.43
46% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 20.6
DQ Write 83.8
DQ Mixed 2.9
17% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 70%
Innostor Ext. HDD 120GB
28GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 25
Write 25.4
Mixed 25.4
33% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.26
46% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 149%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143DB0-CPB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.5% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 15.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 8.7
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback