Today's hottest deals

Intel LAPBC710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemIntel(R) LAPBC710
MotherboardIntel LAPBC710  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210406
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 29 '21 at 23:01
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 62.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 191
71% 127 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 525
58% 458 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Intel(8086 2097) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 28.7
15% 18.4 fps
MRender 20.9
Gravity 30.4
Splatting 20.4
19% 23.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 611100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 918 1112 974 873 731 876 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,613
Write 1,226
Mixed 1,138
SusWrite 914
274% 1,223 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 51.5
178% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 825
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 346
323% 513 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 202%
Great: 494%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E1G32D4NQ-046 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
118% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 59.6
MC Mixed 41.3
133% 46.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 35.7
SC Mixed 15.6
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 118%
This bench: 118%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LAPBC710 Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel LAPBC710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback