Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori, 1080 x 1732 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 03 '21 at 13:53
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 52.1
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 162
58% 105 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 267
37% 276 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 537GB
500GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 31 4.9 4.9 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 289
Write 169
Mixed 255
SusWrite 47
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 12.6
45% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 60.3
DQ Mixed 84.4
72% 110 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 95%
Vmware Virtual disk 64GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 100 55 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 77.3
Write 66.8
Mixed 58
SusWrite 48.7
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
143% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 94%
Vmware Virtual disk 4.5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 21 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.8% Very poor
Read 40
Write 27.2
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 21.9
22% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 23.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 5.2
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback