Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion TS Sleekbook 15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion TS Sleekbook 15  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 193B
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130412
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 05 '21 at 23:09
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-4455M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 43.6
2-Core 57.2
39% 56.2 Pts
4-Core 56.2
8-Core 56.2
8% 56.2 Pts
64-Core 55.4
3% 55.4 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500G
HP(103C 193B) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
2.54% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 2.6
2% 3.6 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.54%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001YAM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 49 41 47 47 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 100
Write 86.5
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 51.7
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.8% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 8
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion TS Sleekbook 15 Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion TS Sleekbook 15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $22
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback