Viak8m AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemViak8m AWRDACPI  (all builds)
Motherboard K8M800-8237
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20061229
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '21 at 00:33
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 3500+-$54
Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 7.8
2-Core 11.6
5% 9.7 Pts
4-Core 11.4
8-Core 8.1
1% 9.75 Pts
64-Core 20.1
1% 20.1 Pts
Poor: 17% Great: 48%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SP1613N 160GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB100-50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 24 33 36 25 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.47% Terrible
Read 4.4
Write 29.3
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 24.9
11% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
37% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.47%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
5.48% Terrible
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 2
6% 2.1 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 0.5
SC Mixed 0.3
1% 0.4 GB/s
Latency 537
8% 537 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback