Asus X550CC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 79% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus X550CC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550CC
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '21 at 02:29
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 34%
CPU Throttled 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3537U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 54.2
2-Core 116
52% 83.4 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 170
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720M
Asus(1043 124D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.8
3% 2.57 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCT-512M3S 512GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VSDB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 335 267 330 323 262 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 412
Write 348
Mixed 285
SusWrite 304
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 8.5
47% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 123
91% 120 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0 Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.1% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.4
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550CC Builds (Compare 930 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550CC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback