Today's hottest deals

MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '21 at 03:48
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 118
57% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 289
33% 258 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Gigabyte(1458 2556) 1GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 23.8
12% 19.2 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 13.1
12% 14.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biostar S100-480GB PLUS 480GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1029A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 295 218 224 223 223 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 479
Write 393
Mixed 340
SusWrite 263
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 21.5
110% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 33.5
69% 139 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 92%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
526GB free
Firmware: 2108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 119 122 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 122
Write 129
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 122
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 160C0 V3 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.4% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback