Lenovo 90Q80069UK

Performance Results


Gaming 140% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 141% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Lenovo 90Q80069UK (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 3715
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201216
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 11 '21 at 20:20
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700K-$236 198,859 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 89.2 1-Core 158 2-Core 295 99% 181 Pts	4-Core 627 8-Core 1,112 105% 869 Pts	64-Core 1,596 99% 1,596 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% MSI(1462 3906) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.85 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	137% Outstanding	Lighting 197 Reflection 186 Parallax 176 160% 186 fps	MRender 174 Gravity 145 Splatting 129 120% 149 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1001 512GB 9,336 User benchmarks, average bench 214% 385GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11170101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1015 973 978 975 982 982 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	190% Outstanding	Read 1,705 Write 1,834 Mixed 1,506 SusWrite 984 339% 1,507 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 75.6 4K Mixed 48.9 162% 54.5 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 403 DQ Mixed 606 363% 372 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 278%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 137GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 328 163 145 147 146 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	77% Very good	Read 460 Write 421 Mixed 381 SusWrite 204 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 52.3 4K Mixed 38.5 125% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 37.4 DQ Write 274 DQ Mixed 248 164% 186 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Tigo LMKU8G68AHFHD-32A 2x8GB 520 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.9% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 22.3 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 27.2 SC Mixed 23.7 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 90Q80069UK Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 100%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 142%

UFO

System: Lenovo 90Q80069UK

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel $236Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	46x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	44x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	1x
RTX 4070-TiNvidia $651Bench 240%, 46,082 samples	1x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 12,020 samples	30x
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1001 512GBWDCBench 214%, 9,336 samples	3x
SABRENT 525GBBench 59%, 37 samples	2x

RAM
LMKU8G68AHFHD-32A 2x8GBTigoBench 86%, 520 samples	35x
PSD432G32002 4x31.8GBPatriotBench 119%, 25 samples	2x
16ATF2G64AZ-3G2E1 1x16GBMicronBench 53%, 270 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $636

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16