Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateMay 15 '21 at 21:31
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 85.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 886
92% 738 Pts
64-Core 1,094
68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 120
Parallax 106
85% 110 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 103
Splatting 93.6
81% 99.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0C-00PXH0 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21705000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1728 1487 788 788 788 787 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,638
Write 1,672
Mixed 1,424
SusWrite 1,061
326% 1,449 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 67.3
270% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,121
DQ Write 1,050
DQ Mixed 1,143
842% 1,105 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 261%
Great: 283%
Amd-raid ST8000AS0002-1NA 8TB
725GB free
Firmware: AR13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 98 97 102 94 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 78.2
Write 34.3
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 97.2
13% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 0.3
9% 4.87 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 0.4
2% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 16%
Amd-raid ST8000DM004-2CX1 8TB
733GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 72 72 76 70 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 47.9
Write 71.9
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 73.1
38% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.4
183% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 100%
Amd-raid ST10000DM0004-1Z 10TB
728GB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 170 170 180 165 178 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 232
Write 206
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 175
125% 172 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.4
688% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Amd-raid ST10000DM0004-2G 10TB
726GB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 167 164 177 161 166 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 126
Write 119
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 169
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.3
1,278% 10 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 135%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 72 72 76 70 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 66.2
Write 104
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 73.3
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.4
189% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 105%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
727GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 146 144 143 145 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 211
Mixed 129
SusWrite 145
228% 171 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 0.8
404% 5 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 5.6
DQ Mixed 1.5
244% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 36.1
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 36.4
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P Builds (Compare 2,318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $754
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback