ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Latitude E6530

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Dell Latitude E6530 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 07Y85M
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140924
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '15 at 11:08
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220 14,369 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 99.5 2-Core 195 67% 147 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 539 54% 441 Pts	64-Core 551 34% 551 Pts
Poor: 40% Great: 74%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 0535) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2639 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4.13% Terrible	Lighting 4.43 Reflection 5.58 Parallax 3.28 4% 4.43 fps	MRender 6.33 Gravity 2.67 Splatting 8.87 5% 5.96 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.13% Great: 4%
Nvidia NVS 5200M 1,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 1535) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.2762 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.34% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 4.69 Parallax 3.5 3% 4.09 fps	MRender 5.67 Gravity 4.37 Splatting 2.96 3% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.34% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB 11,477 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1427 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 105968 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1632 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 129712 (F2) Unknown 100 100 335414	94.2% Outstanding	Read 467 Write 418 Mixed 421 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 31.1 114% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 99.8 139% 257 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 101%
JetDrive Transcend 121GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 127% 75GB free, PID 07d1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	193% Outstanding	Read 272 Write 217 Mixed 194 280% 228 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 33.3 4K Mixed 9.85 1,525% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 17.8 DQ Write 49.6 DQ Mixed 11.9 2,156% 26.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 193% Great: 193%
Kingston DT Ultimate 64GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 42GB free, PID 1652 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 74.8 Write 62.2 Mixed 48.9 76% 62 MB/s	4K Read 4.47 4K Write 9.55 4K Mixed 2.75 435% 5.59 MB/s	DQ Read 4.82 DQ Write 11.4 DQ Mixed 2.28 483% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 55%
OCZ ATV_TURBO 4GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 0GB free, PID ac02 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.66% Terrible	Read 28.6 Write 15.5 Mixed 17.7 24% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 7.24 4K Write 0.14 4K Mixed 0.15 37% 2.51 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.66% Great: 15%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Latitude E6530 Builds (Compare 529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6530

CPU
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	89x
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	66x
Core i5-3340MIntelBench 53%, 12,487 samples	65x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	406x
NVS 5200MNvidiaBench 3%, 1,721 samples	102x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	13x
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $182Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	10x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	22x
16JTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 53%, 458 samples	15x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $248

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback