PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C09 |
Motherboard | MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (all builds) |
Memory | 2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20201130 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | May 18 '21 at 13:39 |
Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 39% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
79%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.2%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 500GB (2016)-$30
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 28 12 34 108 104 MB/s
|
38.5%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
39.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 2,316x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,505x |
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 291x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 636x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 463x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 357x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $359 |