MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C09
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '21 at 11:56
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 256
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 491
59% 454 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
AMD(1002 0502) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
7.18% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 6.6
8% 8.8 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 6.6
5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.18%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDS2500GB 500GB
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0818A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 402 400 398 398 404 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 380
Mixed 384
SusWrite 401
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 28.9
144% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 45.1
82% 155 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 96%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
0GB free
Firmware: JF100-19
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 19.9
Mixed 20.6
16% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 42%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 107 108 108 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 115
Write 96.3
Mixed 75
SusWrite 107
131% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.4
159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 64%
KIOXIA TransMemory 32GB
27GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
23% Poor
Read 120
Write 17.9
Mixed 9
SusWrite 12.9
36% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
45% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 23%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
46.7% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $339
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback