Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99E-ITX/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99E-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160809
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateMay 25 '21 at 14:36
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 201
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 610
57% 474 Pts
64-Core 806
50% 806 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 35.3
80% 50.3 fps
Poor: 93% Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0705AB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 53 54 52 53 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 444
Write 388
Mixed 365
SusWrite 81.3
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 37.3
127% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 240
200% 288 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 92%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 152 154 154 152 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 149
Write 148
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 153
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
270% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 20.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 14.7
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99E-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99E-ITX/ac - $371

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $1,015
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback