bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory16.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1904 x 968 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190619
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 27 '21 at 21:13
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 188
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 353
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID M60-2Q
Nvidia(10DE 114E) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 412.31
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (65 fps cap detected)
51.3% Above average
Lighting 63
Reflection 64.9
Parallax 66
51% 64.6 fps
MRender 55.3
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 65.6
51% 61.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 51%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 64GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 26 26 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB 20GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 53.4
MC Mixed 48.8
132% 46.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback