MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7976
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)  (all builds)
Memory15.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150902
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '21 at 06:28
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 194
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 505
53% 424 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.7% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 70
Parallax 62.2
50% 64.3 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 62.8
Splatting 55.3
50% 62 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 197 168 167 168 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 440
Write 262
Mixed 212
SusWrite 179
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 34.1
126% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 209
179% 265 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 133%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 296 372 395 396 386 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 450
Write 390
Mixed 372
SusWrite 350
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 22.4
111% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 40.7
94% 190 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 84%
Great: 99%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 1TB
736GB free
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1341 1588 972 908 908 880 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,510
Write 1,701
Mixed 1574
SusWrite 1,100
332% 1,471 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 62.3
203% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 678
DQ Write 404
DQ Mixed 553
409% 545 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 215%
Great: 492%
WD Black 3TB (2012)-$205
27GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 98 98 97 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 83.4
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 97.1
64% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 92%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
2TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 140 140 140 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 159
Write 124
Mixed 98.3
SusWrite 139
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$68
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.8% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 22.1
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 20
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) Builds (Compare 2,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $897
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback