Today's hottest deals

HP p7-1436s

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP p7-1436s  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '21 at 03:04
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 45.1
2-Core 97.6
41% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 96.1
8-Core 97.8
13% 96.9 Pts
64-Core 93.5
6% 93.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7540D
HP(103C 2AE0) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
2.92% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 3.4
3% 3.87 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3
Splatting 3.5
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.92%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 302 307 313 303 308 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 412
Write 374
Mixed 334
SusWrite 309
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 49.9
165% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 212
156% 207 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP655410-150-HYCG HP655410-150-HYCG 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.2% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1436s Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1436s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $217Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback