Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire Z3-451

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire Z3-451  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire Z3-451
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJun 02 '21 at 16:30
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5757M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 73
1-Core 25.9
2-Core 47.5
36% 48.8 Pts
4-Core 82.5
8-Core 82.4
11% 82.4 Pts
64-Core 87.6
5% 87.6 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8650G
Device(1297 2064) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1006
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.89% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 7
0% 5.2 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 6.8
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.89%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
782GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 60 34 42 68 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 79.8
Write 95.3
Mixed 49.6
SusWrite 55.2
51% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown A1_ A1_ 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire Z3-451 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire Z3-451

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback