Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 1,710 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 70.2 2-Core 142 59% 97.2 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 542 51% 425 Pts	64-Core 1,572 97% 1,572 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Lighting 21.6 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 20.1 18% 19.7 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 17%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST300MM0048 300GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 44 44 45 44 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	54% Above average	Read 135 Write 150 Mixed 89.1 SusWrite 51.1 79% 106 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.7 380% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1K43BB0-CRC 8x8GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	95.5% Outstanding	MC Read 44 MC Write 34.6 MC Mixed 34.4 108% 37.7 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 18.1 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 80.8 50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 135%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples	133x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	117x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples	102x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	151x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	104x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	94x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	53x
MTFDDAK512MBF-1A 512GBCrucialBench 89%, 258 samples	48x
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	38x

RAM
M393A2K40BB1-CRC 8x16GBSamsungBench 113%, 218 samples	46x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	40x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	39x

Value: 120% - Outstanding

Total price: $93