PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 18E7 |
Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200220 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Jun 14 '21 at 21:34 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 60% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
69.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.2%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 379 415 414 397 381 MB/s
|
86.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
19GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 78 79 80 81 MB/s
|
47.8%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.8%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 1,024x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 852x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 313x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 989x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 331x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 224x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $142 |