Today's hottest deals

GPD G1618-03

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGPD G1618-03  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1618-03
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display720 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 19:07
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 172
2-Core 243
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 590
69% 534 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9616
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 33.4
20% 29 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 20%
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.5% Above average
Lighting 73.4
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 99.8
60% 80.9 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 78.1
Splatting 53.6
53% 66.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin SSD 1TB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52AAT8KA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 179 220 224 226 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 1,499
Write 215
Mixed 352
SusWrite 177
121% 561 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 11.5
111% 26.6 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 102%
Great: 345%
Jmicron Tech 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 209 205 209 210 216 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 327
Write 312
Mixed 301
SusWrite 210
65% 287 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 30.1
98% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 120
88% 115 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 91%
Samsung PSSD T7 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 319 314 320 323 321 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 391
Write 450
Mixed 406
SusWrite 320
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 28.6
93% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 151
113% 150 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 86%
Samsung PSSD T7 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 476 465 476 368 261 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 371
Write 438
Mixed 391
SusWrite 420
92% 405 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 28.7
93% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 141
105% 139 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 86%
Generic MassStorageClass 512GB
477GB free, PID 0764
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 67 68 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 91.5
Write 68.7
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 67
100% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 4.6
293% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 62.1
MC Mixed 43.8
140% 49.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 45.9
SC Mixed 19.3
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% -nan(ind)% 0 355 300 75 0" 1920 1080 MS_0001
Typical G1618-03 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: GPD G1618-03

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback