IBM 49Y6512

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIBM 49Y6512  (all builds)
Memory37.7 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 03:26
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5540
Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 79.3
1-Core 52.2
2-Core 95.5
49% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 350
34% 279 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 119GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 39 43 38 59 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 350
Write 93.9
Mixed 139
SusWrite 51
117% 158 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 6.2
1,438% 8.77 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 117%
Great: 164%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 11 11 11 15 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
127% Outstanding
Read 429
Write 19.5
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 12.9
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 127%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10x4GB
10 of 16 slots used
40GB DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.4% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 0 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback