Today's hottest deals

Asrock B550 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B550 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit색, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 17:33
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 78.3
1-Core 156
2-Core 306
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 873
90% 723 Pts
64-Core 1,114
69% 1,114 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)
52.9% Above average
Lighting 65.3
Reflection 66.4
Parallax 67.7
53% 66.5 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 60.6
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 56%
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.1% Average
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 62.8
Parallax 79.5
42% 64.6 fps
MRender 61.2
Gravity 61.2
Splatting 46.8
45% 56.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000L2 128GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT24L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 76 76 76 76 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 480
Mixed 413
SusWrite 79.9
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 60.4
208% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 364
276% 371 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Adata SP600 256GB
157GB free
Firmware: 2.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 183 218 217 215 217 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.3% Average
Read 189
Write 220
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 209
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 0.9
75% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 66
DQ Write 67.7
DQ Mixed 7.6
22% 47.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 97%
Toshiba MK6459GSXP 640GB
521GB free
Firmware: 0202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 74 73 74 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 58.3
Write 63
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 73.1
38% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
46% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 45%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
218GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 47 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 152
Write 60
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 50.6
99% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.5
121% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL22-22-22 D4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 31.8
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 34.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 100 33.9" 1280 720 WAM3400 QA3410P HDR
Typical B550 Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B550 Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $684
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback