Today's hottest deals

MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B92
MotherboardMSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)  (all builds)
Memory120.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '21 at 16:27
Run Duration401 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 65.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
71% 130 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 863
76% 647 Pts
64-Core 2,346
145% 2,346 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 462.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.5% Good
Lighting 93.1
Reflection 106
Parallax 97.1
76% 98.8 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 96.2
Splatting 0.1
45% 63.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 7 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 82 89 88 90 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 431
Write 496
Mixed 439
SusWrite 89
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 42.1
149% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 184
152% 210 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 318%
Amd-raid Array 4 1TB
609GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2583 2589 2582 2574 2572 2568 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 1,696
Write 2,437
Mixed 1,410
SusWrite 2,578
460% 2,030 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 57.7
188% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 519
DQ Write 539
DQ Mixed 530
398% 529 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 307%
Great: 328%
Amd-raid Array 5 1TB
115GB free
Firmware: 9.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,703
Write 2,585
Mixed 1,368
423% 1,885 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 55
184% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 504
DQ Write 594
DQ Mixed 505
393% 534 MB/s
Poor: 116% Great: 318%
Amd-raid Array 6 1TB
324GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2608 2613 2611 2611 2610 2535 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 1,678
Write 2,542
Mixed 1,374
SusWrite 2,598
465% 2,048 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 54.8
182% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 513
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 521
390% 517 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 305%
Great: 328%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
217GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 381 382 381 382 382 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 380
Mixed 362
SusWrite 380
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 40.7
134% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 283
215% 289 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
222GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 381 382 381 382 382 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 381
Mixed 362
SusWrite 379
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 41.8
135% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 285
216% 291 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 134%
Amd-raid Array 1 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 92 92 97 97 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 429
Write 384
Mixed 440
SusWrite 96.5
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 37.8
140% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 174
149% 212 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 499%
Amd-raid Array 3 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 71 77 77 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
63% Good
Read 144
Write 146
Mixed 127
SusWrite 74.5
92% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.4
275% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63%
Great: 196%
Amd-raid Array 2 16TB
8TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 90 92 91 86 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 272
Write 158
Mixed 138
SusWrite 91.4
122% 165 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 2.1
511% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 105%
Great: 232%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
145% Outstanding
MC Read 59
MC Write 60.4
MC Mixed 54
165% 57.8 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 25.1
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 145%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 37.3" 1280 720 GSM76FC LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,634
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback