Foxconn A6VMX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFoxconn A6VMX  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN A6VMX
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090313
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 01 '21 at 02:37
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Processor model unknown
Socket 940, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 34.9
2-Core 36.3
36% 48.1 Pts
4-Core 36.1
8-Core 37.2
5% 36.7 Pts
64-Core 37.6
2% 37.6 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GS
MSI(1462 8A93) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.66% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.9
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.66%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 86 68 39 79 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 89
Write 92.8
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 63.6
54% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA3 1TB
766GB free
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 66 72 76 58 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.2% Average
Read 79.8
Write 73
Mixed 41
SusWrite 70.5
48% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 6.8
17% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.5
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A6VMX Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Foxconn A6VMX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback