Today's hottest deals

MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210112
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJul 01 '21 at 18:30
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$358
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 113
2-Core 228
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 859
78% 656 Pts
64-Core 2,226
138% 2,226 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,350
Asus(1043 87D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
141% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 297
Parallax 363
121% 270 fps
MRender 360
Gravity 259
Splatting 190
211% 269 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 141%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$117
681GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2025 2009 2030 2011 2012 2008 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,074
Write 2,030
Mixed 1,400
SusWrite 2,016
423% 1,880 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 54.5
183% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 869
DQ Write 379
DQ Mixed 660
479% 636 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 290%
Great: 477%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$117
200GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2229 1732 1433 1241 1183 1087 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,481
Write 2,890
Mixed 1,952
SusWrite 1,484
495% 2,202 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 56.4
192% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 373
DQ Mixed 670
487% 646 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 278%
Great: 477%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA HDWE150 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 133 138 138 137 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 169
Write 179
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 137
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
413% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 107%
Amd-raid WDC WD10EZEX-00B 1TB
618GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 167 167 170 170 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 152
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 168
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.3
259% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Amd-raid ST32000542AS 2TB
579GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 59 61 61 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 93.4
Write 94.5
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 59.2
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 48.7
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 42.5
126% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 28.2
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 41.4
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 119%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 2R 0G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 31% 26 183 98 240 27" 2048 1152 ACR0832 XV272U X
Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $330

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $1,461
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback