Today's hottest deals

Toshiba SATELLITE C50D-A-113

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C50D-A-113  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD PT10ABX
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '21 at 20:23
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
26% Poor
Memory 46.6
1-Core 16.8
2-Core 32.3
23% 31.9 Pts
4-Core 33.9
8-Core 33.6
4% 33.8 Pts
64-Core 29.7
2% 29.7 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
Toshiba(1179 FA30) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.23 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA2OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 72 62 59 70 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 42.7
Write 75.4
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 66.9
38% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 2.3
6% 2.17 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 24 10 5 60 15.5" 1366 768 CMO15A7
Typical SATELLITE C50D-A-113 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C50D-A-113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback