Today's hottest deals

Packard ixtreme M5741

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPackard ixtreme M5741  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard H57M01
Memory2.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100115
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 04 '21 at 02:28
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$40
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 114
52% 85.1 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 180
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320
Sapphire(174B 2150) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
3.15% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.2
4% 2.43 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 0.2
2% 3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.15%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 85 4.5 5.4 3.1 14 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.3% Poor
Read 174
Write 199
Mixed 204
SusWrite 46.5
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 13
51% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 22.7
DQ Mixed 43.7
38% 59.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 61%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
220GB free
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 60.6
Write 51.2
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 60.4
40% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%
Seagate M3 1TB
42GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 26 29 29 29 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 25.6
Write 27.4
Mixed 21
SusWrite 26.2
18% 25 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.7
193% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 64%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
721GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 182 187 186 186 185 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 147
Write 102
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 182
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 106%
WD Elements 2620 2TB
2TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 39.4
26% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
117% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Toshiba ACR256X64D3U1333C9 ACR128X64D3U1333C9 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 ACR128X64D3U1333C9 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
28.8% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 12.8
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.6
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 22 4 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR
Typical ixtreme M5741 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Packard ixtreme M5741

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback