Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H170-Gaming 3

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H170-Gaming 3 (all builds)
Memory	24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160314
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '21 at 17:52
Run Duration	291 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$130 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 112 2-Core 204 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 593 58% 473 Pts	64-Core 604 37% 604 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Zotac(19DA 2375) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.7% Poor	Lighting 36.4 Reflection 49.2 Parallax 30.8 30% 38.8 fps	MRender 36.8 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 34.2 30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 249GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 346 337 315 290 289 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 364 Mixed 293 SusWrite 313 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 92.2 4K Mixed 44.5 159% 57.2 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 305 DQ Mixed 265 219% 314 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 134%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$67 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 822GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 124 125 125 126 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 122 Write 121 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 123 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$67 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 400GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 133 136 137 135 137 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 136 Write 135 Mixed 88.2 SusWrite 134 91% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$67 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 834GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 119 118 118 117 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 127 Write 121 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 116 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$67 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 255GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 105 104 105 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 97.2 Write 91.5 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 103 67% 90.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 84%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 62GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 53.5 Write 69.7 Mixed 56.5 SusWrite 1.1 60% 45.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.2 38% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 70%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.9 0.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	20.7% Poor	Read 120 Write 150 Mixed 66 SusWrite 2.2 108% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 42% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 70%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 121 119 105 115 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 181 Write 163 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 111 163% 128 MB/s	4K Read 8.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 118% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 70%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 121 119 105 114 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 191 Write 143 Mixed 59 SusWrite 110 157% 126 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.1 124% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 70%
HGST HUS 724020ALA640 2TB 674GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.7% Poor	Read 122 Write 124 Mixed 66 SusWrite 1.7 97% 78.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 112% 1.4 MB/s

Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB 931GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 109 109 109 109 109 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.5% Average	Read 112 Write 113 Mixed 56.7 SusWrite 105 129% 96.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.87 MB/s

ST1000DM 003-1CH162 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 931GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 109 109 109 109 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 164 Write 136 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 105 157% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 63%
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB 809GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 0.5 0.3 0.7 0.8 0.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.2% Very poor	Read 101 Write 104 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 2.1 81% 65 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 70% 0.83 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 4x8GB 760 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.1% Good	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 22.3 70% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 25.1 SC Mixed 20.2 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	30	27"	1280 720	CND2700 DP

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H170-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170-Gaming 3

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $90Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	330x
Core i7-6700Intel $130Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	266x
Core i7-6700KIntel $127Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	183x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	209x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	160x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	70x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $116Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	52x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	42x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $36Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $341

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $278	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370