Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-M68MT-S2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M68MT-S2  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120605
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 06 '21 at 14:54
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 15.8
2-Core 101
41% 65.3 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 127
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
MSI(1462 2927) 2GB
CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 462.30
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
5.47% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 8.3
5% 6.7 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 8.4
6% 6.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.47%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S SD S800 512G 512GB
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RY27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 156 174 169 172 178 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.7% Below average
Read 217
Write 172
Mixed 168
SusWrite 165
41% 180 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 7.6
55% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 69.9
DQ Mixed 14.5
21% 38.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 37%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$47
55GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 137 146 150 158 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 141
Write 115
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 144
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82%
Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
33GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 80 80 81 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 54.6
Write 53.8
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 80.1
43% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST2000LM 007-1R8174 2TB
54GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 25.6
Write 26.6
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 26.8
17% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0
73% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
36% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 14.1
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.9
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 23.6" 1280 720 MSI1462 Optix G241VC
Typical GA-M68MT-S2 Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M68MT-S2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback