Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X8DAH+F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X8DAH+F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8DAH
Memory43.4 GB free of 48.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111230
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 08 '21 at 00:22
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 168
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 542
54% 439 Pts
64-Core 1,238
77% 1,238 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Sapphire(1DA2 E426) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 21.6.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Lighting 116
Reflection 125
Parallax 169
94% 137 fps
MRender 97.2
Gravity 115
Splatting 84.2
80% 98.8 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$30
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 247 246 246 241 247 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.8% Very good
Read 262
Write 250
Mixed 242
SusWrite 245
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 35.7
117% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 101
102% 165 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 127%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 0 0 163 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 1,199
Write 1387
Mixed 1,295
SusWrite 115
224% 999 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 51.6
184% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 218
166% 224 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 122%
Great: 177%
WD Gold 6TB (2016) -$235
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01M03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 172 164 174 156 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 124
Write 161
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 166
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.6
194% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 HMT41GV7BMR4C-H9 HMT41GV7BMR4C-H9 ATMEL 26DF321 84GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.8% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 4R 3G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 49% 37 273 230 144 23.5" 1920 1080 AUS2420 ASUS VG24V
History: Score 29: 3R 2G 8B | Score 40: 4R 3G 11B
Typical X8DAH+F Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro X8DAH+F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $583
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback